So, I’m late to this fray,
but I figured I would pick up on it anyway.
I didn't even know there was an issue till there had been an issue for some time.
Here’s the drift, which I
didn’t see until mid-way through Monday’s busy workday.
Starbucks, my expensive-but
loved-home away from Coushatta home (as there is none here), has changed its
red cups for the holiday season.
Last week, the
coffee giant unveiled the design of this year’s cups, which have become
something of a Starbucks tradition, which I also was not aware of (I'm blissfully unaware of so many things). The company’s designers went for a
minimalist look “with a bright poppy color on top that shades into a darker
cranberry below.”
Looked red to me, but I digress.
“We have anchored
the design with the classic Starbucks holiday red that is bright and exciting,”
said Jeffrey Fields, Starbucks
vice president of design and content. “The ombré creates a distinctive
dimension, fluidity and weightedness.”
Now, let’s lay
aside the fact I have no idea what that means, the ombre’, fluidity and
weightedness I mean, there was something left off the cup – and I’m not making
this up.
There are no
holiday symbols.
The cup is as red
as Santa’s nose, but there is nothing there to suggest that it is being done
for Christmas.
And all heaven
broke loose in some, maybe just a few, Evangelicals out there.
Breibart News
tweets: Starbucks Red Cups have erased any sense of Christmas, after years of
at the very least upholding a capitalistic, post-Victorian image of the
Christian holiday.
Again, I’m not
making this up, just in case you're as blissfully unaware as said writer.
Facebook images
sprouted like those noted Christian symbols of horns on a Reindeer: Starbucks
goes red on All Christmas Cups.
The camps broke
into two or three. On one side there were the Christians who saw this as
someone robbing them of their high-priced but wonderfully tasting Lattes.
Leah tweeted,
“Since you are running away from Christianity, I’m running from you.”
On the other side
were the pagan, heathen coffee swilling mobs who could care less.
Mark tweeted,
“Starbucks is rounding Christians up into coffee death camps and making them
drink Pagan Spice Lattes.
In the middle
were the Christians who were swilling their high-priced but wonderfully tasting
Lattes who could care less.
(My favorite)
Adam tweeted, “Starbucks took Merry Christmas off their cups because of Christ;
so tell them your name is Merry Christmas and they’ll have to put it on the
cup.
And God simply
laughed.
Or cried.
Or both.
The “attack on
Christmas” starts every year about this time, doesn’t it? The Christmas
decorations, which have little to do with honoring a child who was born to give
his life for our own stupidity, er, sin, start to come out and the next thing
you know, someone is taking something off a building in downtown Americana and
we think we have to do something (we Evangelicals, which I still think of
myself as), instead of simply going on loving and doing whatever we want in the
name of Christ.
Again, I didn’t even
know Starbucks had a tradition, though the Spice Latte was/is starting to be
part of my own once I travel the 40 miles to play $11 or $12 for two of those
babies when I can. Luckily for my so worn out wallet, I can't do that often.
I guess the
bottom line for all this is Starbucks is a private business that can do
whatever the heck it wants. You are able to do the same. Don’t buy or buy, the
issue doesn’t change.
We’ve got far
bigger pressing issues than red cups. I think we might be able to agree on
that.
They really are
rounding up Christians in foreign lands and they are really killing them and
all this mess we get ourselves into doesn’t help them one dang bit.
That is what
angers me, not whether snow falling on a red background or whatever in the heck it was.
I long for the
days when our cups ranneth over with love.
Or perhaps they
never did, and that was just a tradition that never was.
2 comments:
Spot on, Billy! But I have to add my own opinion that I am utterly disgusted by folks who must whine and rant and cry wolf over superficial nothings. It's a disgrace to the Church and the Gospel. I want to call them CINO's -- Christians In Name Only. (I wish I'd thought of that, but I saw it somewhere.)
Kevin,
I'm going to steal that CINO. It will re-appear sometime in the future
Post a Comment